Bunnylady
Herd Master
"If I breed this rabbit to this rabbit, what colors can I get?"
If I had a nickel for every time I have heard some version of that question, I might not be on easy street, but I'd sure find it easier to pay my feed bill.
And with all the times I have seen someone's eyes roll back in their heads as I try to explain why they'll get those colors, I think I may have found a new technique for hypnotists.
It's not that bad, guys - really.
Some people are perfectly comfortable with the language of genetics. This is aimed the rest of the world - people who are interested, and who might recognize a word like "heterozygous," but maybe can't quite remember what it means, let alone how to pronounce it. As much as possible, I am going to try to avoid the geek speak, though some is just unavoidable . . sorry.
Almost everyone is aware that living things have DNA, the amazingly detailed instruction manual for what they look like and how they function. Interestingly, almost all living things have two copies; one that came from the female parent, and one from the male.
A trait is anything you can observe about an animal. The particular segment of DNA that codes for a particular trait is called a gene, and the specific place where that segment is located is called a locus (plural, loci).
With me so far?
Some genes come in more than one form. The correct term for the various forms is "alleles," but for some reason, there seems to be some confusion here. Most folks use the word "gene" when what they really mean is a specific form of the gene (example, "the Chocolate gene"), and just for simplicity's sake, I will bow to common usage and do the same.
Most of the time, when genes have more than one form, and an animal inherits one form of the gene from one parent, and another form from the other, you only see one form getting expressed. That's referred to as dominance. When assigning letter symbols to represent genes, the most dominant one gets written as a capital letter. Recessive genes take a back seat to the dominant ones; for a recessive gene to get expressed, it has to be the only form present (or at any rate, there can't be any more dominant forms present).
Please note: "dominant" and "recessive" refer to how the genes interact as far as expression, they have nothing to do with how likely a gene is to be inherited. If an animal has one copy of a dominant gene, and one copy of a recessive gene, both genes have an equal chance of getting inherited. A dominant gene is no more likely to get passed on than a recessive one; the only difference is that you can always tell who gets the dominant one because you see it; you will only see the recessive if it came from both parents.
We are talking about coat color here, and there are a bunch of genes that influence coat color. It is the combined effects of all of them that results in the color we see. Basically, every animal has the potential to produce two pigments; a yellow/red pigment (pheomelanin) and a black/brown pigment (eumelanin). You know how a little bottle of yellow food coloring looks red? That's how pheomelanin works; it looks yellow when there's just a little bit of it, and looks red when there's a lot of it. Eumelanin does the same, to a degree - normally, it looks black, but thin it out a little, and it can look brown, as it does on the Siamese Sable.
There's another way that eumelanin can look brown; you can change the actual shape of the pigment granule so light plays on it differently. That's what the Chocolate gene does, and that's the first gene we will discuss here.
It's often called the B locus, and it's a good place to start, because there are only two forms of the gene. The dominant form (designated B) creates round pigment granules that layer in such a way that hardly any light passes through the hair shaft, and it appears black in color. The recessive form, b, creates oval granules that allow a little bit of light to pass through, giving a chocolate brown color to the hair. B and b interact in the classic pattern of dominance; as long as an animal has even one copy of B, whatever eumelanin is in its coat will be the round granules that look black in color. An animal must have two copies of the recessive form b in order to show the color known as Chocolate.
So:
BB - black
Bb - black
bb -chocolate
Another gene that has only two versions, which interact in the classic way, is the dilution gene, D. The full color form (D) allows both the yellow and black pigments to do whatever the other genes tell them to do, with no interference. The dilute form (d) restricts the amount of both pigments that go into the hairs, and also causes the pigment granules to clump together, allowing more light to pass through. Thus, a Black rabbit becomes a Blue, a Chocolate becomes a Lilac, a Siamese Sable becomes a Smoke Pearl, etc.
DD - full (dense) color
Dd -full color
dd - dilute
So, how do you know the difference between a DD and a Dd? Just looking, you can't tell. If you have a pedigree, you may see that the Black rabbit had a Blue father, and since the only thing a Blue has at the D locus is dilute (d), you know that the rabbit had to have inherited dilute from him. Or your Black doe may deliver Blues in her nest box - once again, the only way you can see dilute is if the rabbit has two copies (dd), and the only way it gets two copies is one from the mother, and one from the father - so now you know that she must have a gene for dilute, since her babies had to get one from her.
I suppose this is as good a moment as any to introduce the "alphabet soup." You may have seen notations like this on other discussions about color genetics, or maybe written on the margin of a pedigree:
aaB_C_ddE_Enen (that's a Broken Blue, by the way).
It's a brief way of noting what you know about the color genes a rabbit has. If you don't know what a gene is, you leave a blank; someday you may see something in a nest box that allows you to fill those in. There are a few other genes that influence color, like Vienna and Wide-band, but most people just leave them off unless they are talking about a color that particularly involves them.
So far, we have talked about the genes at the B locus and the D locus; nice, easy genes that only have two forms. Now things get a little more complex; let's look at the A locus - the pattern genes.
The most dominant form in the A series is the Agouti gene (A). Agouti is the wild-type coloration; white on the belly and underside of the tail, lacing on the ears, light rings around the eyes, light edging around the nostrils, under the jaw, and between the toes. The body hairs on an Agouti-patterned animal have light and dark bands on them; the coat usually has a ticked appearance, and when you blow your breath into the coat, you see rings of color, like a target (typically, dark at the tip, light in the middle, and blue-gray next to the skin).
The most recessive form in the A series is the Self-patterned gene (a). Being the most recessive, the only way you see it is if it is the only form present (aa). A typical Self patterned rabbit is one solid color from nose to tail; if we use Black as an example, he is black on his belly, black in his ears, just all over completely black. He may still have yellow pigment in his coat, but you can't see it, because the black covers it up. Self-patterned animals sometimes are a lighter color next to the skin, but they fade gradually from one shade into the other, while Agouti-patterned animals have clearly defined bands.
And here's where things get interesting - there is a third type of pattern gene; the Tan gene (at). Tan has the solid body color of a Self, with the light colored "trim package" of an Agouti - ear lacing, eye rings, light belly, etc. And just as the appearance of a Tan is intermediate between an Agouti and a Self, that's just where it falls in the order of dominance, too. Tan is dominant to Self, and recessive to Agouti. So, if you have a Tan-patterned animal, you know it doesn't have an Agouti gene, but you can't rule out the possibility of a Self gene unless it comes from a long line of Tans (or you never get Self patterned babies, even when breeding to Selfs).
This is called a "ladder of dominance:"
A - Agouti
at - Tan
a - Self
The gene at the top of the ladder is the most dominant, the gene at the bottom is the most recessive, and anything placed in between is dominant to those below, and recessive to those above. The rabbit will express the most dominant gene it has, so if you are looking at a Self, you know it can't have either Agouti or Tan, or that's what it would look like.
This seems like a good place to take a break; clear so far?
If I had a nickel for every time I have heard some version of that question, I might not be on easy street, but I'd sure find it easier to pay my feed bill.
And with all the times I have seen someone's eyes roll back in their heads as I try to explain why they'll get those colors, I think I may have found a new technique for hypnotists.
It's not that bad, guys - really.
Some people are perfectly comfortable with the language of genetics. This is aimed the rest of the world - people who are interested, and who might recognize a word like "heterozygous," but maybe can't quite remember what it means, let alone how to pronounce it. As much as possible, I am going to try to avoid the geek speak, though some is just unavoidable . . sorry.
Almost everyone is aware that living things have DNA, the amazingly detailed instruction manual for what they look like and how they function. Interestingly, almost all living things have two copies; one that came from the female parent, and one from the male.
A trait is anything you can observe about an animal. The particular segment of DNA that codes for a particular trait is called a gene, and the specific place where that segment is located is called a locus (plural, loci).
With me so far?
Some genes come in more than one form. The correct term for the various forms is "alleles," but for some reason, there seems to be some confusion here. Most folks use the word "gene" when what they really mean is a specific form of the gene (example, "the Chocolate gene"), and just for simplicity's sake, I will bow to common usage and do the same.
Most of the time, when genes have more than one form, and an animal inherits one form of the gene from one parent, and another form from the other, you only see one form getting expressed. That's referred to as dominance. When assigning letter symbols to represent genes, the most dominant one gets written as a capital letter. Recessive genes take a back seat to the dominant ones; for a recessive gene to get expressed, it has to be the only form present (or at any rate, there can't be any more dominant forms present).
Please note: "dominant" and "recessive" refer to how the genes interact as far as expression, they have nothing to do with how likely a gene is to be inherited. If an animal has one copy of a dominant gene, and one copy of a recessive gene, both genes have an equal chance of getting inherited. A dominant gene is no more likely to get passed on than a recessive one; the only difference is that you can always tell who gets the dominant one because you see it; you will only see the recessive if it came from both parents.
We are talking about coat color here, and there are a bunch of genes that influence coat color. It is the combined effects of all of them that results in the color we see. Basically, every animal has the potential to produce two pigments; a yellow/red pigment (pheomelanin) and a black/brown pigment (eumelanin). You know how a little bottle of yellow food coloring looks red? That's how pheomelanin works; it looks yellow when there's just a little bit of it, and looks red when there's a lot of it. Eumelanin does the same, to a degree - normally, it looks black, but thin it out a little, and it can look brown, as it does on the Siamese Sable.
There's another way that eumelanin can look brown; you can change the actual shape of the pigment granule so light plays on it differently. That's what the Chocolate gene does, and that's the first gene we will discuss here.
It's often called the B locus, and it's a good place to start, because there are only two forms of the gene. The dominant form (designated B) creates round pigment granules that layer in such a way that hardly any light passes through the hair shaft, and it appears black in color. The recessive form, b, creates oval granules that allow a little bit of light to pass through, giving a chocolate brown color to the hair. B and b interact in the classic pattern of dominance; as long as an animal has even one copy of B, whatever eumelanin is in its coat will be the round granules that look black in color. An animal must have two copies of the recessive form b in order to show the color known as Chocolate.
So:
BB - black
Bb - black
bb -chocolate
Another gene that has only two versions, which interact in the classic way, is the dilution gene, D. The full color form (D) allows both the yellow and black pigments to do whatever the other genes tell them to do, with no interference. The dilute form (d) restricts the amount of both pigments that go into the hairs, and also causes the pigment granules to clump together, allowing more light to pass through. Thus, a Black rabbit becomes a Blue, a Chocolate becomes a Lilac, a Siamese Sable becomes a Smoke Pearl, etc.
DD - full (dense) color
Dd -full color
dd - dilute
So, how do you know the difference between a DD and a Dd? Just looking, you can't tell. If you have a pedigree, you may see that the Black rabbit had a Blue father, and since the only thing a Blue has at the D locus is dilute (d), you know that the rabbit had to have inherited dilute from him. Or your Black doe may deliver Blues in her nest box - once again, the only way you can see dilute is if the rabbit has two copies (dd), and the only way it gets two copies is one from the mother, and one from the father - so now you know that she must have a gene for dilute, since her babies had to get one from her.
I suppose this is as good a moment as any to introduce the "alphabet soup." You may have seen notations like this on other discussions about color genetics, or maybe written on the margin of a pedigree:
aaB_C_ddE_Enen (that's a Broken Blue, by the way).
It's a brief way of noting what you know about the color genes a rabbit has. If you don't know what a gene is, you leave a blank; someday you may see something in a nest box that allows you to fill those in. There are a few other genes that influence color, like Vienna and Wide-band, but most people just leave them off unless they are talking about a color that particularly involves them.
So far, we have talked about the genes at the B locus and the D locus; nice, easy genes that only have two forms. Now things get a little more complex; let's look at the A locus - the pattern genes.
The most dominant form in the A series is the Agouti gene (A). Agouti is the wild-type coloration; white on the belly and underside of the tail, lacing on the ears, light rings around the eyes, light edging around the nostrils, under the jaw, and between the toes. The body hairs on an Agouti-patterned animal have light and dark bands on them; the coat usually has a ticked appearance, and when you blow your breath into the coat, you see rings of color, like a target (typically, dark at the tip, light in the middle, and blue-gray next to the skin).
The most recessive form in the A series is the Self-patterned gene (a). Being the most recessive, the only way you see it is if it is the only form present (aa). A typical Self patterned rabbit is one solid color from nose to tail; if we use Black as an example, he is black on his belly, black in his ears, just all over completely black. He may still have yellow pigment in his coat, but you can't see it, because the black covers it up. Self-patterned animals sometimes are a lighter color next to the skin, but they fade gradually from one shade into the other, while Agouti-patterned animals have clearly defined bands.
And here's where things get interesting - there is a third type of pattern gene; the Tan gene (at). Tan has the solid body color of a Self, with the light colored "trim package" of an Agouti - ear lacing, eye rings, light belly, etc. And just as the appearance of a Tan is intermediate between an Agouti and a Self, that's just where it falls in the order of dominance, too. Tan is dominant to Self, and recessive to Agouti. So, if you have a Tan-patterned animal, you know it doesn't have an Agouti gene, but you can't rule out the possibility of a Self gene unless it comes from a long line of Tans (or you never get Self patterned babies, even when breeding to Selfs).
This is called a "ladder of dominance:"
A - Agouti
at - Tan
a - Self
The gene at the top of the ladder is the most dominant, the gene at the bottom is the most recessive, and anything placed in between is dominant to those below, and recessive to those above. The rabbit will express the most dominant gene it has, so if you are looking at a Self, you know it can't have either Agouti or Tan, or that's what it would look like.
This seems like a good place to take a break; clear so far?
Last edited: