I see your point about the Jersey Wooly, and I do agree that it is similar to my feeling about the Florida White, however, at the time that the Jersey Wooly was created, there was no other angora haired small or dwarf breed, and it seems there was a need (desire) for one. Unlike the fanciful claims of the Florida White breeders who think that it would have made a good meat rabbit, I don't think any of the Jersey Wooly originators had any thought that it would become a breed which was used to produce fiber. They simply wanted a small fuzzy rabbit, and they were at least honest enough with themselves to say so.JoieDeViveRabbitry said:I feel this way somewhat about Jersey Wooly rabbits...
I feel that they are caught in the middle of being a wool producing breed and a cute pet. They are too small to actually be used for wool, you would need 10-12 of them to produce the wool that my good French Angora buck produces in a year.
I think these breeds are around simply because someone "could" and did develop them. Someone fancied them for something and alot of work went into it and thus we have the FW.
What is the history, were they by any chance developed for research purposes? Makes sense.
While we're at it, lab rabbits technically are not any one breed which we would recognize, as purebred fanciers. They are more properly called strains, and there are many types, each with their own particular characteristics. These are usually traits which are physiological rather than visible to the naked eye, so it's much more complicated than simply discussing which "breeds" per se are used in research.waynesgarden said:I don't understand your comments. Apparently. Rabbits destined for laboratories are not coming out of backyard rabbitries. They are coming from licensed facilities that are as sanitary as as the labs they are producing for. They are raised in extremely clean conditions regardless of the breed. That is what I said, in not so many words, hence the desire for researchers to keep using the lab rabbit strains which they already had, rather than switching to this new breed, back in the 60's, and have to start all over producing sanitary rabbits once again, after eliminating everything that they had come in contact with at these backyard rabbitries which developed the breed.
Florida Whites are used in research, often involving the effects of products on the eyes. Maybe, but my point, again, is that they have not taken over and become the breed of choice for most lab work. Lab researchers have kept their old, larger strains, and just haven't embraced the Florida White, as the original breeder had hoped.Wayne
RabbitMage said:What's the point of a Britannia Petite? Unusual size and type, the combination which is found on no other breed. Or a Checkered Giant? Same as the Britannia, but add an unusual pattern found in no other breed. Or A Thrianta? Good example. Same as the Florida White. We already have nice red color in other breeds. I don't see the point on just putting it on a medium sized, average type rabbit and calling it a different breed. Or likely 40 of the 47 breeds we have that aren't common in the the pet, fur/wool, or meat trade? Most of the other ARBA recognized breeds have some sort of distinction that sets them apart from all other breeds. The Florida White and the Thrianta do not. They are simply small sized rabbits of a particular color. If one were presented with examples of these rabbits, without any history, one could not tell for sure if they were purebred animals or just crosses. With most of the other breeds, one can easily identify them as seperate and distinct from all other breeds.
Different people enjoy different things about different breeds. Exactly. I never said people can't enjoy whatever they want. I stated my case about this particular breed, and provided a convincing argument for my opinion. I don't care who breeds whatever they like to.