elevan
Critter Addict ♥
I'll see if I can't find the time to find the websites again...and I'll post the clinic trials notes for you...or just PM them to you as I agree that we really should keep the topic to what the OP asked.cmjust0 said:Im gonna need to see some references on this, please. You're making it sound as if these meds could have gone either way -- either pour-on, or oral -- but simply tested to be more effective as pour-ons, and so they became pour-ons.. Sorry, but I'm having a *really* hard time swallowing the notion that any med formulated with 'Aromatic 100' or any other volatile hydrocarbon was *ever* intended for oral use.elevan said:I did some research on giving pour ons orally...and it turns out that almost all of them were originally tested orally and then as a pour on. In cattle it was found to be more effective when poured on.
Links, please.
Oh, and btw...I found an MSDS on Eprinex on Merial's australian website (pdf). I'll grant you that an MSDS is about risk to humans, but nonetheless, here's what it says about ingestion:
"INGESTION: If swallowed urgent hospital treatment is likely to be needed. Follow instruction of Poisons Information Centre. Medical observation for delayed symptoms needs to be carried out for up to 48 hours."