babsbag
Herd Master
I just learned something new. That is why this BYH is so awesome. @greybeard thank you for the great explanation and I guess since something works it doesn't mean it is the right way.
50 years ago, most chargers were not pulsed at the same length as today's chargers--and some were not pulsed at all. High impedance chargers. The old ones that were pulsed, accomplished the pulse via a mechanical switch, which of course was meant it was closed (on) for longer length of time and open (off) for usually the same amount of time. You could stand by the charger and actually hear the click--click--click of this switch. You could easily count the pulses off and the 'on' time was over 1 second. Why? No mechanical device can operate for long at the rates needed to qualify as a low impedance charger--they would just wear out. Modern low impedance chargers accomplish the pulse via an integrated circuit board, and that "on" pulse is extremely short--no moving parts. They have an on-time somewhere in the 100 micro-seconds range (100 millionths of a second), but still emit a pulse at rates of about 50-60 times per minute, meaning the control circuit is off for far longer than it is on.I've touched so many in my life.... most body parts have been zapped.
Nothing like hitting one while standing in a Creek. Only time I've ever been injured was about 50 years ago I got stuck under one and it was across my eye. Eye was swollen for several days.
I have a feeling the energizers were a little different then. More frequent pulses, maybe higher amperage well.
Biggest concern was damaging the energizers.
Sounds like a good argument and Parmak has been around a long long time and makes good products, until you consider a couple of things.6.Q.How does the joule relate to the performance of an electric fence charger?
A.It doesn`t. It would take a lengthy discussion to explain all of the different factors which make an electric fence effective and safe. The joule does not measure the effectiveness or safety of electric shock.
Two easily measured factors determine fence charger performance. Guard voltage and shock current. Safety dictates that the amount of shock current, on time (the amount of time the shock is on the wire) and pulse rate be held within strict tolerances established by recognized safety agencies such as Underwriters Laboratory (U/L) and Canadian Standards Assoc. (CSA). The value expressed in the joule does not decode to the user the effectiveness of a shock.
What controls livestock is voltage and current. You must have voltage in order to force electricity through the conductor (fence wire) as well as vegetation touching the fence, etc., and you must have current in order for the livestock to feel the shock.
The most effective fence charger will have the highest, safest power (voltage and current) possible with the shortest on-time, thereby allowing the fence charger to develop a shock which is more effective and at the same time is safe to use.
Example of how misleading the Joule rating is: The Parmak model Pet Gard is a continuous current, non-pulsing type charger designed for very small animals in backyards, gardens, etc. Using the joule rating (Voltage x Amps x Time) the Pet Gard (PG-50), because it is a continuous current fence charger, would have an unlimited joule ratingmaking it the most powerful fence charger, which it is not.
In summary, it is important to point out that Underwriters Laboratories (U/L) or CanadianStandard Assoc., (CSA) do not recognize the joule as a measurement when applied to electric fence chargers.