Handling our Horses

ducks4you

Loving the herd life
Joined
Aug 10, 2009
Messages
418
Reaction score
8
Points
153
Location
East Central Illinois
I cut this to a new topic, after I realized that this was a really long response to the Parelli thread.
Just watched a Clinton Anderson rerun--the one with one of the last performances with his mare Mindy, in Las Vegas--and my jaw dropped when one of audience members gave a slap on the wrist to the Parelli's. :ep
Boy, once the criticism starts, there's no going back.

I think that those of us who have been long-time horse owners, and have studied classical horsemanship need to be a little bit more vocal with our opinions about new phrases and new methods. If the "new" lines up with the old-time, tried and true horse training methods, I believe that we can endorse some of the plethora available on the Internet and on Satellite/Cable programming. Otherwise, I believe that we owe it to new horseman to speak out against them.

The big names that I have read are trainers who have been trained by successful trainers, and owe what they know to previously successful horseman. I learned a great deal from the writings of Alois Podhajsky, George Morris, and Reiner Klimpke, among others (including Ben Green, who wrote humerous, early 20th century Western Horse stories!!) and I spent my first few years teaching horsemanship with my spare time nose buried in "Practical Horseman." I read THAT until I saw the articles began to repeat thems--only so many ways you can teach somebody to do gymnastics!!
I digested everything I read and tried it out. All of the trainers above are in lock-step agreement about how to treat your horse. That is my yard stick.

I do not want to put ALL of these new trainers into the same pigeon hole. Obviously people's lack of time coupled with many people's lack of knowledge has created a need to make horses rideable again. I believe in capitalism. I think it's quite humorous that "impulsion" is now called "moving a horse's feet". (Re-packaging, like the "Sham-Wow.") I find it odd that people are concerned about their horse's boredom under saddle. :/

I have found some programs very helpful, like Ken McNabb's program about handling stallions. There was good stuff for geldings and mares, and he emphasized getting the horse to pay attention and to lead well. Another helpful program was Julie Goodknight's, with a well-mannered QH, whose owner was changing from Hunter to Western Pleasure. Her gelding was slamming to a halt on the forehand. Julie had her canter on one rein, halt and back-up, then cue for a trot on the other rein. You could see the horse begin to use his quarters.

I believe that those of us that know should edit our comments so that they err of the side of the rider ALWAYS being safe. I like the one comment Clinton made on this program. He said that if a horse kicks another horse, the "kickee" says "OMPH", then moves to another part of the pasture to eat. A human gets the same kick, and ends up in the hospital recovering from several broken ribs.

YET, our well-mannered horses move around us just like we move around a baby crawling on the floor, both trying hard to not hurt the weaker party.

I remember reading some articles by the Parelli's in the mid-1990's. Their ideas seemed interesting. I've even tried some of their new stuff this year, like moving your body like the horse's gait while riding that gait. I dismissed that one because I like my horses light and responsive. I was getting too much of a response, which would have been great if I was jumping, :lol: but I wasn't.

What are your thoughts?
 

w c

Overrun with beasties
Joined
Aug 23, 2010
Messages
152
Reaction score
3
Points
91
That's Parelli's own fault. He got greedy and he started getting carried away with himself. He sunk his own boat the last couple years, no one did it for him.

And don't count him out just yet, he will still have paying customers for a long time to come.

I think people need an instructor right there with them teaching them the nuts and bolts. People just don't like to take lessons and be told in person what to do, they rather read.

I think occasional clinics, videos and books have a limited usefulness. Not saying no usefulness, saying they are no substitute for instruction, they have their place but won't substitute for having someone teaching the nuts and bolts in person. Instead many people make the mistake of being over-reliant on the internet and celebrity trainers, books, videos, etc. There's no substitute for live feedback. People like to think that 'feel is king', but until that 'feel' is educated by in person feedback from an instructor, it can tell one to do just about the opposite of what is needed.

As an example friend of mine was having trouble getting her horse to canter. Horse kept taking the wrong lead. She was screaming and yelling. 'WHY is this horse always taking the wrong lead, JUST TO MAKE ME MAD'. Well, I said, because your legs are telling him to take that lead. "NO THEY AREN'T". 'Well, your left leg is way back and your right leg is forward'. 'NO THEY AREN'T" Honestly, it just did not feel that way to her. But she had the wrong leg back asking for the lead. Anyone could have seen that, but she couldn't feel it.

There is also a lot of misinterpretation. That is why Alois Podhajsky himself said for years he did not want to write a book about riding and for years the SRS was very adamantly against writing anything down. Why? As they would say, 'because someone might read it', LOL.

Horse training has gotten to be such a racket on the internet and websites, there is so much money involved and there are so many charlatans, so much fakery, in all areas. It's very, very hard for an eager beginner to know who to listen to or make sense of all the conflicting statements.

Dressage and Western riding are especially vulnerable to charlatans because they have an 'image' in people's minds. Let the buyer beware, especially of the trainer celebrity who does one type of riding and says his methods work for all kinds of riding. LEt the buyer beware.
 

michickenwrangler

Loving the herd life
Joined
Nov 4, 2009
Messages
1,253
Reaction score
22
Points
114
Location
NE Michigan
When you get down to the basics, all these guys are teaching the same thing: get your horse to respect you and spend time with them.

I liked Pat Parelli at first, but he seems to get caught up in his equipment and gimmicks. Clinton Anderson seems a little more interested in sticking in plugs for his sponsors than not. I can't listen to Dennis Reis for any length of time! GaWaNi PonyBoy seems to forget that Eurasians TAMED the horse and have been horse people longer than American Indians. Technically, the Whites have more potential as a horse culture than American Indians.

I have also seen people so "into" a particular trainer that they don't listen to anything else. Case in point, a woman on a competitive trail ride had a difficult time controlling her high strung 4 year old and when someone asked, "Why don't use start using a kimberwicke on him for a little extra control on the trail?" She replied with, "The John Lyons tape said that I should only use a full-cheek snaffle." ??!!

Find a trainer that fits your style, but also be willing to experiment and accept new ideas.
 

w c

Overrun with beasties
Joined
Aug 23, 2010
Messages
152
Reaction score
3
Points
91
There is a story going around the internet about Gawani that is so hysterical that I can hardly stand to even mention it so I just buckled up and forced myself. Since you brought up his name.
 

goodhors

Overrun with beasties
Joined
May 15, 2010
Messages
863
Reaction score
18
Points
79
And you leave us hanging after a remark like that!!

What a mean person, or are you still giggling about the story and can't type?
 

w c

Overrun with beasties
Joined
Aug 23, 2010
Messages
152
Reaction score
3
Points
91
Oh goodness I couldn't tell it.

But the first time I heard it, I couldn't stop laughing for a couple hours.
 

w c

Overrun with beasties
Joined
Aug 23, 2010
Messages
152
Reaction score
3
Points
91
Waaall...no. This kind of think is strictly woman to woman. True? Well, I wasn't there, but the two gals who were, well...they...tend to egg each other on a lot, so who knows.

Let's just say that all that riding bareback in a Native American outfit, that sometimes it can be a little uncomfortable. Even after say, a couple minutes. On a level road. At a walk.
 

goodhors

Overrun with beasties
Joined
May 15, 2010
Messages
863
Reaction score
18
Points
79
Having only seen a few photos of him, in his "native" costume attire, maybe he got a wedgie from his loincloth! The ladies mentioned might have seen him trying to fix the problem and got an eyeful!! Maybe he just doesn't spend enough hours riding to "work thru" any issues attire can cause.

My husband says he figures the Native Americans were really tough because their clothing on bareback horses, riding for hours and days, had made them immune to most any kind of pain!

Husband said he would NEVER be able to ride dressed like the Native Americans did. And with the Calvary riding McClellen saddles for long times, just OUCH!! If you didn't have the original "buns of steel" and other parts, you were in a lot of pain! When the two groups met they were some VERY CRABBY men and the battles took their minds off the pain.
 
Top