Much stranger things have happened, and they are still the owners so have the "right" to charge whatever they want and you have the "right" to refuse and move. justsayin ![Frown :( :(]()
Much stranger things have happened, and they are still the owners so have the "right" to charge whatever they want and you have the "right" to refuse and move. justsayin![]()
I am also sorry for your DH's loss of his grandfather. The holidays just seem to make a loss even harder to bear.
I do hope that you have the original agreement on paper, and I would not have signed a new lease, under duress or any other way, without a consult with a lawyer. Yes I know they cost money, but after all you have put into this place, if things are not EXACTLY right, with all the i's dotted and t's crossed, you could lose everything. Believe me, I have seen it happen firsthand. So please, get some good legal counsel, before you put one more penny into this, if you don't have any now.
Wanting something, and doing it the the morally right way as it seems you have tried to do, won't count for diddly if there are any legal loopholes they can go through. This latest lease thing shows that they are not morally bound to do things the right way, they are in it to see how much they can get out of you. And are probably delighted to have you "over a barrel" with the time of year making next to impossible to move. They are going to milk you for all they can as long as they can....and you may find that the only alternative is to move and possibly sell most everything you have worked your a** off for, in order to not go bankrupt. Things like the stalls in the barn, cleaning out 2 ft of manure won't cut a thing with a judge, you did it for yourself not for the property owner. Since you moved in it as is, a judge will say that you knew it was like that, if you were unhappy you should have filed a grievance against them, sought legal recourse and/or moved out. If you have the written original agreement, then you will have some room to fight, but every time you do something that as landlords they are supposed to do, then you are enabling them to "let you" continue to do the work. And they are not going to do anything except let you continue to pay the price.
I am sorry that it sounds as if I am a negative person, but I have seen too often how people like this work. They see you as a free ride to getting their neglected place back together, and if you continue to have financing delays or problems, then you won't have a leg to stand on if they want to put you out, and sell it to someone who has available financing....DO NOT TRUST THEM any longer...
Sorry BYH didnt notify me of this post. If you have a "high" water table on the property it is very possible the pond was put in in place of the cistern. You used to be able to water livestock from surface water so many farmers would make ponds on their property or purposely fence across streams so their livestock has water access. You have to remember that back in the day there was no way you were going to bucket a few hundred gallons of water from your pump faucet in your kitchen out to the livestock daily. The cistern and even the open wells were not made to withstand that kind of use and would have run the cistern/well dry daily to get livestock water. In warmer climates they of course had things like windmill drawn water tanks but in cold climates like we live in it wasnt reasonable. Be option was ponds/streams, though streams were preferred as running water takes longer to freeze and requires constant colder temps to stay frozen solid.
The real history and lay out of old wells/cisterns can often never be figured out. Some properties have many wells simply because a well went dry or got full of silt at some point and the land owner decided...hey its time for a new well. Even in modern days now because do the same thing because they want either a deep well, a shallow well or even for reasons like trying to get rid of sulfer in their water.