- Thread starter
- #4,451
rachels.haven
Herd Master
New and unused here before. In this case, it was a horse wormer that I don't usually use and probably won't again for a long time.What is “a novel wormer”?
New and unused here before. In this case, it was a horse wormer that I don't usually use and probably won't again for a long time.What is “a novel wormer”?
Woah - she got mad?? Definitely a big warning flag. Fingers crossed for your solution!I wish. She got mad that I didn't "trust" her after I asked. (...Uh, no? I've already been bitten once this year! and technically she wouldn't know if they had it or not either if no tests were done)
I actually might have a solution to my small genes problem in the wings. Maybe.
The positive test for CL just shows that the animal was exposed to the disease, not that they have active cases. Abscesses in lymph node sites are active cases and animals should be disposed of. All animals vaccinated for CL will show the animal to be positive for CL from the vaccine on future tests. The test is only testing for antibodies against CL. It doesn't mean active cases.technically she wouldn't know if they had it or not either if no tests were done
Yeah, but my concern is that from what I hear you can have an active, open abscess case suddenly happen quickly from what I hear, so I'm hesitant to even risk bringing untested goats onto the property. This area has always had a HUGE number of filth flies (like, a traumatize you, kind of number), even when I was here as a little kid and we had no animals near the house, so all the pieces are in place for good transmission if I set the stage unintentionally.The positive test for CL just shows that the animal was exposed to the disease, not that they have active cases. Abscesses in lymph node sites are active cases and animals should be disposed of. All animals vaccinated for CL will show the animal to be positive for CL from the vaccine on future tests. The test is only testing for antibodies against CL. It doesn't mean active cases.
Depends on how important the testing is to you. Once you test, unless an animal throws out an abscess in a lymph node area, and you operate a closed herd, you should be safe. BUT if you import bucks or does, or even semen, it can sneak in. We used to simply remove any got with a lump and take it to the auction immediately. That was 30 year ago.it's $30/full screening though. I thought $20/full screen was a lot
I didn't know that about bangs. Yes, when goats are vaccinated for CL they test positive, but most people don't vaccinate for it unless they are trying to work through having it and the vaccine just suppresses abscesses and doesn't prevent them from contracting the bacteria, also, I think the vaccine for goats keeps getting taken off the market due to lack of demand so I don't know if you can vaccinate for it as often as the vaccine requires for abscess suppression. I think there are anecdotal cases where they lose "positiveness" on the test if years pass after last vaccines and they don't have it and don't get exposed, but I haven't seen much on that. Just someone on a forum who worked through their own outbreak.I don't know all the ins and outs of goats and this CL stuff... but I can tell you that any animals that are vaccinated for "Bangs" will always show a positive in a blood test afterwards... so if the animal is negative with a test, then you vaccinate, from what @Ridgetop says, it will always show a positive for CL....
One thing I do not understand is if it is bacterial caused, why it cannot be "irradicated" in an animal through antibiotic treatment.
All I understand is that it is of a big concern to many and I admire your being adamant to not bring animals into the property if you can possibly avoid it.
WAADL is recommending not to vaccinate goats for CL. The vaccine manufacturers are also no longer recommending it for goats. It is not very effective on goats from what I understand, and they may have found other problems with it when vaccinating goats. In England and Europe, they have a different CL vaccination. They are also marketing a potential cure for it which is not approved for the US yet.also, I think the vaccine for goats keeps getting taken off the market due to lack of demand so I don't know if you can vaccinate for it as often as the vaccine requires for abscess suppression.
I'd be interested in hearing about that cure someday even if it's not US available/approved. The science would be interesting. It would also be amazing if someday it was commonplace and the disease could be treated away. (and yes, there are only a handful of human cases, but I don't want to be that one. I've been the "lucky" one enough in life with weird medical reactions and stuff-that or one of my menfolk would get it. I'll keep that door shut the best that I can.)WAADL is recommending not to vaccinate goats for CL. The vaccine manufacturers are also no longer recommending it for goats. It is not very effective on goats from what I understand, and they may have found other problems with it when vaccinating goats. In England and Europe, they have a different CL vaccination. They are also marketing a potential cure for it which is not approved for the US yet.
Isolating infected animals; lancing, draining, and treating the abscesses with antibiotics is still the only way to treat infected animals. Some animals do not ever get it regardless of exposure. Removing animals from the flock that have abscesses can limit the exposure of the rest of the flock. Infection of humans is almost unknown.