Coronavirus Covid-19 Is it Affecting You and How?

[farmerjan]

I am thinking that I recently saw an article that lists all the different companies that are making the vaccines... and the ones that are using "lines" from fetal tissue.... what goes into each companies "formulas"... partly it was for the people who are boycotting due to their anti-abortion beliefs.... can't think of it off hand but try Mercola.com.... and you might have to go to DuckDuckGo to find sites that have not been banned. I did watch something on ThriveTime Show... time to free America....one of the sessions was with Dr Christiane Northrup.... I watch so m uch when I can... or listen while I am working in the house.... that I can't remember where I see or hear it all.

 

[Grizzlyhackle]

I am thinking that I recently saw an article that lists all the different companies that are making the vaccines... and the ones that are using "lines" from fetal tissue.... what goes into each companies "formulas"... partly it was for the people who are boycotting due to their anti-abortion beliefs.... can't think of it off hand but try Mercola.com.... and you might have to go to DuckDuckGo to find sites that have not been banned. I did watch something on ThriveTime Show... time to free America....one of the sessions was with Dr Christiane Northrup.... I watch so m uch when I can... or listen while I am working in the house.... that I can't remember where I see or hear it all.

Thank you. I only get soundbites generally, other than the weather. Straight to the Roku and binge watch with DW. Most of it's depressing and infuriating......just say Pelosi and I'm ready to scream.

 

[farmerjan]

The CDC website has a page with comparisons of the different companies vaccines....
Just reading the 2 that are "fast track approved" I would not in your case take them as the anaphylactic shock is listed as a reason to NOT take them. Both say no eggs used....
You can click on several of the different underlined parts and get alot of different info.

 

[Bunnylady]

it is said that the RNA in it changes our DNA in ways that they don't know yet.

https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/different-vaccines/mrna.html#:~:text=Messenger RNA vaccines—also called,use in the United States.

But. of course, the conspiracy theorists will tell you not to trust anything from the CDC, because they have some unspecified agenda, blah, blah blah . . . .

But seriously, there's no such thing as "unbiased news." EVERYBODY, including you and me, have their own particular take on a subject; anyone who claims to be unbiased is a liar, and not to be trusted. All disseminators of "news"" have one bias in particular - grabbing you by your vulnerabilities, bringing you back to their site again and again, so you can be offered up to their advertisers and keep the advertising revenue flowing into their coffers. As long as there is any possible benefit to the source for providing information, their information should be viewed with a skeptical eye; the only source you can reasonably trust is someone who (a) is genuinely knowledgeable, and (b) has nothing to gain or lose in the sharing of their opinion. The chances of finding such a source on a "news" website are virtually nil.

anaphylactic shock is listed as a reason to NOT take them.

Anaphylaxis is simply the most severe type of allergic reaction; just because a person has had that type of reaction to one allergen (for example, a bee sting) doesn't mean that they have to avoid exposure to another unrelated type (for example, peanut butter). Because vaccines share a lot of the same components, if one has had an anaphylactic reaction to a previous vaccination, there is good reason to avoid this vaccine too, but simply having one or more allergies is not sufficient cause. People can have more than one allergy, of course, and people with a history of allergies can develop new ones, so a higher level of monitoring may be called for, but avoidance isn't necessary.

 

[Nao57]

This is not a responsible way to communicate about the Covid vaccine or any issue for that matter. „Some people say“ is a terrible way for supporting any argument. Who exactly, where did they get that information and what are the qualifications of the people making these statements? Same for referring to an „article“ without naming the source. This here is just spreading rumors and disinformation at a time when literally thousands and thousands of people’s lives depend on us as a society acting on scientifically and empirically verified information. Please don’t do this.

...except for that I'd seen the references. If I'd not seen references I wouldn't have mentioned it. And the person telling me about the first polio vaccine worked with vaccines and was one of the first people to research Parvo in dogs.

So there was credibility.

 

[farmerjan]

Since @Grizzlyhackle said he has had a trip (or maybe more) for anaphylactic shock, that is WHY I said I would not want to take the virus "vaccine" if I was him....

 

[Grizzlyhackle]

The CDC website has a page with comparisons of the different companies vaccines....
Just reading the 2 that are "fast track approved" I would not in your case take them as the anaphylactic shock is listed as a reason to NOT take them. Both say no eggs used....
You can click on several of the different underlined parts and get alot of different info.

Thanks again. I'm gonna check these sites you've referenced. My hear attack wasn't near as bad as those times my throat closed up. But hey it was ' simply anaphylaxis'. I'm bailing out on this thread ,starting to get aggravated.

 

[Grizzlyhackle]

Thanks again. I'm gonna check these sites you've referenced. My hear attack wasn't near as bad as those times my throat closed up. But hey it was ' simply anaphylaxis'. I'm bailing out on this thread ,starting to get aggravated.

Since @Grizzlyhackle said he has had a trip (or maybe more) for anaphylactic shock, that is WHY I said I would not want to take the virus "vaccine" if I was him....

farmerjan wow that cdc website gave me a lot to think about. Thanks again

 

[Baymule]

I read in several places that the vaccines had cells from aborted babies in the vaccines. That sounded so far "out there" that I just couldn't believe it. I just found an article that addresses this very thing.

Some excerpts from the article, link so you can read the whole thing.

Is the coronavirus vaccine made from fetal cell lines?

As coronavirus vaccine prototypes move closer to testing and approval, some Catholics are debating the ethical sources behind a leading vaccine candidate.

www.catholicnewsagency.com

With some common vaccines, such as those used to fight chicken pox and measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR), the cell lines of babies who were aborted decades ago are used to grow the weakened diseases.

This is also reportedly the case with some coronavirus vaccines in development, such as one worked on by the University of Oxford and Astrazeneca, which relies on the HEK-239 cell lines from a baby aborted in the Netherlands in the 1970s.


Non-Moderna scientists had initially made DNA vectors with the gene sequence of the spike protein, and injected them in HEK-293 cells to produce the spike protein. That work was studied and evaluated by experts at NIAID and the University of Texas, who determined that the spike protein was a good candidate for testing. Moderna was not involved in the DNA construction nor was it involved in the evaluation of the construction.

Thus, Brehany said, while the company has some association with the use of cell lines from elective abortions, it is not responsible for that use, and its vaccine was not produced using those HEK-293 cells.

 

[Baymule]

I look at this as a discussion. There is so much floating around out there, what to believe? No reason for anybody to get annoyed at any one else. We are all learning new things, things that maybe we didn't want to learn, but here we are.

And of course we ALL know that our government officials would NEVER lie to us!