That is in the easement surveys at the courthouse, what isn't in there is the right to do anything with the road. Though there is covenants out here that states the following:Do you know if your private road was put in before 1966? Historical aerial photo website could help. If put in after, this statues seems to apply stating minimum width of 20ft for private roads and byways applies or state applicable minimum width.
7-14-2112. Width of roads, MCA
leg.mt.gov
We have similar rules in Texas that I studied to see what would be munched if they upgraded our county road from 3rd class (20ft min) to 1st class (40ft min).
I would have court put in writing what the applicable minimum and maximum road width for your class is since that seems to be a point of contention. Sorry your neighbors suck.
No that's a off shoot easement for one property, the purple arrow points at it. The highlighted yellow is her property, the orange highlighted property is the next one to take down when I take her out and the purple highlighted one was supposed to be on the list, but went from squatting there to the orange highlighted property these past few weeks. Black/grey highlighted is all of me and I own the end of the main road easement out here which gives me rights to all of the road which is the green line. Magenta arrows is where I started from main road and where I stopped at her driveway (how convenient) and the orange one has a road cutting across the property to the right of his straight to the rock now. Blue arrows are as far as we need the rock since yellow, orange, purple and the two magenta arrow properties circled like buzzards at one time to each other properties hence the road condition now. Since then the magenta arrow properties have shunned all others and don't want to help with the legal proceedings, it's one owner of those two properties too.Are you at the end of easement? Upper left.
If me, I'd be out cheering you on -- that woman truly is crazy! . The road improvements help her too.
Can't fix stupid.